Real Estate Digital Marketing in Kathmandu, Nepal

Why us

Why Kathmandu needs its own approach

Valley CPC on property terms is high; job-seeker and aggregator clicks consume small budgets. Unique project URLs, NPR range transparency where appropriate, and WhatsApp/phone CTAs match how Nepal buyers actually enquire.

Services

Real Estate Digital Marketing Services in Kathmandu

Proof

What you can expect

• We track calls and visits — not occupancy or price claims we cannot verify
• Published cases cited as GBP method only
• Client-owned accounts
• Compliance on project claims is client/legal responsibility

Kathmandu real estate and project launch playbook

Project launches and broker offices compete in Nepal’s highest local service CPC band — launch URLs and broker Maps beat boosting PDF brochures.

Most campaigns in Nepal lose on slow mobile pages and vague landing copy — not on audience size. DataReportal’s Digital 2026: Nepal (late 2025) puts internet users at about 16.6 million (~56% of the population), with most people on phones and roughly nine in ten online users on at least one social platform. Kathmandu and the Valley skew higher than remote districts; even in cities, Nepali copy and tight geo-targeting usually beat a one-size English campaign.

Real-estate search is among the pricier categories — often NPR 45–95 (benchmark). A proper project page and a verified Maps listing beat boosting a PDF; track site visits offline so reports reflect real interest.

90-day order

1. Launch URL per project phase with honest possession timelines
2. Broker GBP with showroom photos and call tracking
3. Search for high-intent project + location terms — not generic “buy house Nepal”
4. Offline site-visit import for honest cost per qualified visit

Maps method from published clinic/trades cases — no property KPIs invented. Hub: real estate Nepal · real estate SEO.

Launch sequencing that avoids dead inventory

Valley launches compete in the highest local CPC band, and the expensive mistake is boosting a PDF brochure or sending every ward to one tower page. Sequence the work: a launch URL per phase with honest possession timelines, broker GBP with showroom photos and call tracking, and Search fenced to project-plus-location terms before any broad prospecting.

Measurement follows the same order. Import offline site visits tied to the launch URL and report cost per qualified visit — never blended reach, invented yields, or handover dates the developer has not committed. Maps work follows the published clinic and trades order (category, photos, reviews) before Search spend rises.

Worth checking for Kathmandu

• Launch URL per phase — never one homepage for three towers
• Broker vs developer GBP split when both sell the same project
• NRN vs Valley-resident intent split — diaspora gifting vs resident buyers need separate campaigns
• Possession-timeline honesty on every project page — no invented handover dates

What you get each month

• Maps performance — views, calls, and direction requests
• Organic traffic by landing page and service line
• Ad cost per lead and qualified enquiry volume (when ads are running)
• Top search queries from Search Console, filtered by city where relevant

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Do you guarantee sales or site visits?

No. Scope is visibility, leads, and tracking — not closed deals.

Is there a published real-estate case?

No KPI table on this site. Maps-first method from clinic/trades cases.

Rentals vs sales?

Separate campaigns and landings when intent and CPA differ.