Case brief: Fashion e-commerce SEO

Best for: Week 3 content architecture · Week 1 CAC/LTV · Week 8 “reduce paid dependence”
Source of truth: /case-studies/kathmandu-ecommerce-seo/ · Narrative: /blog/gurkha-technology-ecommerce-seo-case-study/

Situation

Kathmandu fashion & lifestyle store (500+ SKUs). Strong catalog, weak organic; ~90% traffic from paid; slow mobile (~4.2s). Brand withheld.

Numbers (as published, 12 months)

Metric Before After
Organic sessions/mo ~2,300 ~13,500 (+487%)
Organic-led revenue — ~3×
Paid share of traffic ~90% ~45%
CVR 1.2% 3.8%
CAC / CPA NPR 850 NPR 360 (−58%)
Load time ~4.2s ~1.8s

What they did (sequence matters)

  1. Technical foundation (speed, crawl, schema)
  2. Category/product on-page + Nepal long-tail map
  3. Links/PR + local signals
  4. CRO on checkout/snippets late in the year

MBA discussion

  • Why is “more blog posts” the wrong first move here?
  • How does organic growth change the LTV ≥ 3× CAC conversation for an e-com MBA pitch?
  • Tie to Week 2: speed and mobile are acquisition multipliers, not decoration.

Concepts in Play

  • Technical SEO: speed, crawlability and structured data (schema) that let search engines read and rank the site.
  • Long-tail keywords: specific, lower-volume searches (e.g. “kurta set for wedding Kathmandu”) with clearer buying intent.
  • Customer acquisition cost (CAC): marketing spend divided by new customers acquired.
  • Paid dependence: the share of traffic or revenue that disappears the day ad spend stops.

Reading the Numbers

Work these from the published figures only; do not add new KPIs.

  1. Conversion rate rose from 1.2% to 3.8%. Out of every 1,000 sessions, how many more orders is that? Why does this lift matter as much as the traffic growth?
  2. Paid share of traffic fell from ~90% to ~45%. Explain why a lower paid share can reduce CAC even if the ad budget did not change.
  3. Load time fell from ~4.2s to ~1.8s. Which other published metric would you expect that change to affect, and why?

Limits of the Evidence

  • Twelve months of change overlap with seasonality, catalogue growth and market trends; the case is a before/after comparison, not a controlled experiment.
  • “Organic-led revenue ~3×” depends on the attribution model used. Ask how a sale that started on an ad but finished on organic search was counted.
  • The brand is withheld, so you cannot verify the rankings independently; cite the source page rather than restating the figures as your own.

Apply It to Your Sandbox

  1. Run your sandbox’s home and one product or service page through PageSpeed Insights and record the mobile Largest Contentful Paint (LCP).
  2. Write five long-tail keywords for your sandbox that include a product and a Nepal location or occasion.
  3. Map each keyword to exactly one page, and note which ones still need a page.
  4. Name the first technical fix you would make, and why it comes before writing more blog posts.

Cite in pitches

“Kathmandu e-com SEO case: organic sessions +487% and ~3× organic-led revenue in 12 months; CAC −58% (source).”