Block 3 wraps: A3 submitted.
| Pillar | What It Measures |
|---|---|
| Expected CTR | Ad relevance to searcher intent |
| Ad Relevance | Keyword-to-ad copy match |
| Landing Page Experience | Speed, relevance, mobile-friendliness |
Search terms review (one month, NPR 12,500 spend): the broad-match keyword "ielts" triggered "ielts result", "ielts registration date", "ielts free pdf" and "ielts jobs". These irrelevant terms consumed about 30% of spend: NPR 3,750 wasted per month.
Fixes:
Quality Score effect (simplified): the advertiser below has an Ad Rank of 120.
| Your Quality Score | Actual CPC ≈ 120 ÷ QS |
|---|---|
| 4 | NPR 30 |
| 8 | NPR 15 |
Doubling Quality Score roughly halves the price of the same position. Combined with the recovered NPR 3,750, the same budget buys far more relevant clicks.
Executive summary for A3:
Full walkthrough in the session note.
Recall the education PPC case for a real Quality Score / account structure optimization cycle.
Block 3 done. Next: Block 4 — email automation, analytics, and the final capstone review.
Apply it: A travel agency spends NPR 40,000 a month on Google Ads; 25% goes to searches containing "visa form" and "embassy address". Calculate the waste and propose fixes.